Logo

Conveyor vs. LazyApply

Both auto-apply. One is a Chrome extension working job boards from your own browser; the other applies from the cloud on employers’ own ATS.

When LazyApply Is Better

  • You want the highest raw daily volume: LazyApply’s Ultimate plan lists up to 1,500 applications a day, and you’re comfortable with an extension applying from your own browser
  • You want to apply on job boards such as Indeed, ZipRecruiter and Dice, which Conveyor doesn’t use

When Conveyor Is Better

  • You want applications submitted from the cloud directly to the employer's ATS, not by a Chrome extension working job boards in your own browser
  • You care about matching accuracy — smart skill matching + hard qualifying gates, not just volume
  • You want screening-question answers handled automatically from your profile, with anything it can't answer emailed to you
  • You want to know why a job didn't match and what to change — Conveyor's Preference Advisor shows exactly which of your settings are blocking matches, with a projected unlock count per fix

Pricing Comparison

Conveyor

$19.99

mo (Basic)

  • 200 auto-applies/mo
  • Direct-from-ATS sourcing
  • No LinkedIn account risk
  • Monthly, quarterly, or yearly billing — plus a free tier

LazyApply

$99

yr (Basic, annual billing only)

  • 15 applies/day (~450/mo)
  • Chrome extension; its site lists Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter (LinkedIn Easy Apply in earlier versions)
  • Annual plans only; no free trial
  • Refunds within 30 days, first subscription only, under 100 applications, if it fails to work as advertised

Cost per submitted application

~$0.10 (Basic — $19.99 ÷ 200 applies)

Conveyor

vs

~$0.02 (Basic, at 15 a day)

LazyApply

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureConveyorLazyApply
Submission methodConveyor AdvantageDirect ATS form submission from the cloudChrome extension applying on platforms such as Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse
Job-board account riskConveyor AdvantageNone from us — it never uses your job-board accountsRuns in your own browser on job boards whose terms restrict automation (Indeed bans automating Indeed Apply)
MatchingConveyor AdvantageSmart skill matching + hard qualifying gatesSearch filters (title, location, salary, remote, date posted) and a daily quota
Résumé & cover lettersNone — no generated cover letter; auto-apply sends your résumé as-isRésumé profiles you choose from (1, 5 or 20 by plan)
Application volume (entry tier)200/mo (~7/day)450/mo (15/day)
Billing modelFree tier, then monthly/quarterly/yearlyAnnual only — no monthly plan, no free trial
Match optimization guidanceConveyor AdvantagePreference Advisor shows which settings are blocking matches, with a projected unlock count per fixNo equivalent described on its site

The difference is where the application actually goes

LazyApply is a Chrome extension: you install it, and it applies on job platforms from your own browser. Its site now lists Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter; earlier versions also advertised LinkedIn automation. Plans are annual, from $99 a year for 15 applications a day to $999 for 1,500 a day, and jobs are picked by search filters. Applying through job-board accounts brings in the platforms' own rules: LinkedIn prohibits bots and extensions that automate its site, and Indeed's terms ban automating Indeed Apply.

Conveyor submits directly to each employer's own ATS (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, and other platforms) from our cloud, with your own email and phone — there's no job-board account involved, and every application is gated on you actually clearing hard qualifying checks (skills, seniority, location, salary) first, so volume never comes at the expense of relevance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can LazyApply get my LinkedIn account banned?

LazyApply's current site lists Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter rather than LinkedIn, though earlier versions of its site advertised LinkedIn automation. Any extension that automates activity on LinkedIn puts the account at risk: LinkedIn says users of such tools "risk having their accounts restricted or shut down". Conveyor never touches your LinkedIn or any job-board account; every application is submitted directly through the employer's own ATS.

Which one has higher application volume?

LazyApply's top (Ultimate) tier allows up to 1,500 applications/day for $999/year. Conveyor optimizes for applications you're actually qualified for rather than raw volume — its $19.99/mo Basic plan includes 200 auto-applies/month, gated by hard qualifying checks so you aren't spending applies on jobs you'll be auto-rejected from.

How does pricing compare?

Conveyor has a free tier and bills monthly, quarterly, or yearly — credits are only ever deducted on a confirmed submission, never a failed attempt. LazyApply is annual-billing only, with no monthly option and no free trial, so you commit to a full year upfront; its refund policy covers only a first subscription, within 30 days, with fewer than 100 applications, where the product "demonstrably fails to function as advertised".

LazyApply details are from lazyapply.com (home, FAQ, refund policy, download-extension and Indeed bot pages) and an archived June 2024 copy of its homepage, accessed 2026-10-20, and may change. LinkedIn and Indeed rules are quoted from linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a1341387 and indeed.com/legal. Conveyor pricing shown is the published Basic tier. We encourage you to evaluate each tool directly.

Learn more about Conveyor

See how direct-from-ATS sourcing, smart skill matching, and safe automated submission work together — no LinkedIn bot, no wasted applications.

Ready to auto-apply the safe way?

Start applying to jobs you actually qualify for — safely, without touching LinkedIn.